You’re not getting me. And I’ll say your definitely mistaken about Underwood and a mortise. I’m saying, why not still stick to Ali as murderer?
C Kniclo Contact Only : Then the pee break works when you consider C Kniclo was still looking for a washroom.
I like to think things through.
Of course that could work. In the past two years, I haven't said it couldn't and neither did Dekle or Banks or Nina or some of the other researchers. I believe Kattrup theorized along these lines too. Of course Ali could have been the murderer. It's the sole reason I took 432 threads off the Forums and put them in storage because I had pushed the Ali was innocent, C.Kniclo was the only man who could have done the crime and George Damon was a real mensch triad.
I just recently, like a day or so ago, mentioned the awful possibility.....possibility....that by Damon coming forward with the key....a key left in Cranford by a man who only paid for the room...that Damon actually assisted in the release of a murderer...in complete contrast to the Narrative of the past 120 years since Ali was released.
Even Luke Kummer, who has sympathy for Ali, now questions whether there was a Farmhand in the first place because of the politicized maneuver pulled by Damon which allowed him a wide berth in presenting his affidavit without two members of his household and his wife not presenting one at all. Charles Brennan worked for Damon and to be frank, could have easily supported Damon simply to keep his job or to be rewarded or out of loyalty.
Yesterday, you were critical of Dekle's book...and yet, without his book, the possible role of Ali now as a murderer would have not been pushed back to where it belonged : right up there with the possible guilt of C. Kniclo. Modern Brownian research began in 2001. From that time until 2020, Ali was seen almost invariably as a victim when in fact we now know the playing field is a lot more even.